In a recent report published by the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, where a student lives
still determines where a student ends up, despite a decade's worth of "education reforms" in NYC.
"The portfolio district model adopted by Mayor Michael Bloomberg in New York City is often held up as a national model for high school 'choice,' touted
as the best way to reduce pernicious race- and income-based achievement
gaps. According to this model, student demographics are 'no excuse' for
poor performance: teacher quality is the single most important
determinant of student success. But this AISR study on college readiness
shows that in spite of a decade of efforts in New York City to expand
choice and ensure that the most disadvantaged students do not invariably
attend the most disadvantaged schools, student demographics still
stubbornly dictate destiny."
Gotham Schools posted this
link yesterday that brilliantly maps this study's results - be sure to check it out. If you are a New Yorker, you might be interested in playing around with the map's drop down menu to highlight your own neighborhood and neighborhoods around you. Here's what I got when I selected my own neighborhood:
|
Source: http://www.nyccej.org/college-readiness |
According to the data, 46% of students around where I live in NYC are graduating high school ready for college. That's scary, but believe it or not, there are places that scored significantly worse (e.g. click anywhere in South Bronx). My thoughts are this: a neighborhood is a dynamic, living and breathing place, populated with people who are self-interested. The pro-school choice movement is taking advantage of the "self-interested" part of that by pitting families against their own neighborhoods. Let's face it, if I was a parent living where I am now, and I saw that only 46% of students were graduating college-ready, I'd do my best to ensure my kids get enrolled somewhere else, even if I had to submit my kid's name in a lottery. I really wouldn't care about trying to "support" my own neighborhood's growth and diversity by enrolling my kids at the local school. At the end of the day, my kid's education comes first. It's the government's job to dictate policies that ensure equity exists within our public schools. A pro-choice education model does not build equity, it destroys it.
Comments
So true. And if all parents with the proper resources do the best for their child, then the public school system is doomed to fail. Chalk up the school-choice movement to another bad idea started with good intentions.