Skip to main content

Demography is Still Destiny in NYC

In a recent report published by the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, where a student lives still determines where a student ends up, despite a decade's worth of "education reforms" in NYC.
"The portfolio district model adopted by Mayor Michael Bloomberg in New York City is often held up as a national model for high school 'choice,' touted as the best way to reduce pernicious race- and income-based achievement gaps. According to this model, student demographics are 'no excuse' for poor performance: teacher quality is the single most important determinant of student success. But this AISR study on college readiness shows that in spite of a decade of efforts in New York City to expand choice and ensure that the most disadvantaged students do not invariably attend the most disadvantaged schools, student demographics still stubbornly dictate destiny."
Gotham Schools posted this link yesterday that brilliantly maps this study's results - be sure to check it out. If you are a New Yorker, you might be interested in playing around with the map's drop down menu to highlight your own neighborhood and neighborhoods around you. Here's what I got when I selected my own neighborhood:

Source: http://www.nyccej.org/college-readiness
According to the data, 46% of students around where I live in NYC are graduating high school ready for college. That's scary, but believe it or not, there are places that scored significantly worse (e.g. click anywhere in South Bronx). My thoughts are this: a neighborhood is a dynamic, living and breathing place, populated with people who are self-interested. The pro-school choice movement is taking advantage of the "self-interested" part of that by pitting families against their own neighborhoods. Let's face it, if I was a parent living where I am now, and I saw that only 46% of students were graduating college-ready, I'd do my best to ensure my kids get enrolled somewhere else, even if I had to submit my kid's name in a lottery. I really wouldn't care about trying to "support" my own neighborhood's growth and diversity by enrolling my kids at the local school. At the end of the day, my kid's education comes first. It's the government's job to dictate policies that ensure equity exists within our public schools. A pro-choice education model does not build equity, it destroys it.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Mista, you are absolutely right!This truth of the matter is that change takes a VERY long time, and no one wants their child to be a sacrificial lamb in that process. That is why, after allowing my child to be in the public school system for 8 years, I pulled him out because I no longer trusted it to provide him with the "academic rigor" it claims to provide when I saw how it is regularly undermined in real practice.
Yo Mista! said…
@ Anonymous:
So true. And if all parents with the proper resources do the best for their child, then the public school system is doomed to fail. Chalk up the school-choice movement to another bad idea started with good intentions.

Popular posts from this blog

On My Visit to My Old High School

I had the incredible opportunity to visit my old high school while I was in Chicago last week.  This was something I was really looking forward to; I was worried I wouldn’t have enough time to cram in a visit. I wanted to not only visit my old teachers, but also to walk around the hallways aimlessly and remember what it was like to be me eight years ago. It still blows my mind that I’ve been out of high school for that long. Okay, fine. The voice of accuracy in my head desperately wants me to clarify how long it’s really been. Technically, I had gone back to visit a few of my teachers shortly after I graduated high school, but I choose not to count that as a “proper” visit as I was still in college and coming back home quite often. It’s not like I was living out of the state as I am now. So it doesn’t count, okay? So Wednesday morning, I walked into the visitor’s entrance at gate 3 and received my visitor’s pass for the day. It was odd because as a student, I never en

We Need to Talk About Tenure

The idea and privilege of "tenure" in public education has garnered a lot of attention as of late. Most people who have never worked in education a single day in their lives seem to feel that tenure is unfair and teachers should work under the same expectations that other "regular" and hard-working Americans work under. At least, that's the narrative being presented in the media. Three years ago, I would have agreed, but I didn't know any better. At the college and university level,  tenure  is difficult to obtain and can take 4-8 years. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but from what I think I know, the candidate usually needs to have published some sort of research and have demonstrated a strong teaching record, among other things. Before becoming a high school teacher, I understood why tenure was necessary at the college and university level as it protected academics when they published work that went against the mainstream, and thereby prevented profes

Resurrection

I'm back.  It's been nearly a year since I've last written on Yo Mista!  A lot has changed personally. Yet nothing has changed professionally. And I guess that's why I've been so uninspired to write.  Over the last year, my professional life took a backseat to my personal life. When the dust settled, I realized I didn't want to write  Yo Mista!  anymore. I still felt passionate about my work, but I was somehow uninspired. My day-to-day at school over the last year hasn't changed. I still teach over-age, at-risk students at an alternative high school. Everyday, crazy shit happens in my classroom. Everyday, a student either feels supremely connected to me and my content or feels without direction and completely out of touch with education. My students and I still keep each other on our toes. The only problem is, I'm getting jaded.  This is my fifth year of teaching at-risk youth and I'm getting tired of seeing students arrive to school hig